Talk:Rajpal Yadav

Untitled
Although even a minor film actor is in a sense a public figure, a very minor criminal case is not sufficiently significant in their overall career to be a prominent part of a bio.  DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Given that the subject just passes the borderline of notability so I think that comparing his notability with the coverage this criminal case has got, I think two sources are enough for a brief addition of that criminal case as this sort of Indian actors don't get much coverage. Although we can remove things on request by the subject if no one disagree but here I disagree as the article is full of his establishment. Sourced critism will balance the article. So, what you think @DGG should I add it? Both the sources are reliable.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  18:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I already gave my opinion. He would be notable without it, and it's irrelevant to his career. For all I know, he thinks that any publicity is good publicity, but I think we have somewhat different standards. But I'm not abou to fight the issue.  DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm going to add the content. Per our policy every contentious and negative material should be sourced. And here the content is sourced so I'm going to add it. Cheers,  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  06:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)