Talk:Ram Kapoor

NOTE!?!?!?
Hey there Ram Kapoor fans. As you can see this page does not have any pictures. I am the current moderator of this page and it will stay that way but feel free to add anything that lets Ram Kapoor fans communicate. I, and all the Ram fans, would defentaly appreciate some pictures! So get going every body. ***NOTE*** This message should not be deleted or you will be reported to wikpedia athority. I will delete it myself when the page is where it needs to be. Thank you. - the preceeding comment was signed by 72.75.17.248
 * What are you talking about? There are no such things as moderators of pages. There is no such thing as "Wikipedia authority" and I'd be surprised if you actually managed to find a "Wikipedia official" to help you. Anyway, I did add a picture, but it had to be removed because of non-free image issues. - Bhavesh.Chauhan 01:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

People That Visit This Wiki Page
Since I have started this page I declare that this discussion can be a forum. It can be about anything from the well-being of this article to discussion on Kasamh se or any other of Mr. Kapoors works. This is not MY page but OUR page. - the preceeding comment was signed by 72.75.21.243 on 11:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This is not acceptable. Wikipedia Discussion pages are provided for discussing improvements to the article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Finally, Please sign your comments always. - Bhavesh.Chauhan 01:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

that was kinda wierd
correct me but dont cross out my work. well it doesnt matter now. w.e

Add an External Links
Why I am not able to add link of his official blog in the external links section. Ram Kapoor have recently launched his official blog [ http://ramkapoor.blogspot.com/ ]. I tried to add this but it was removed by some bot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.14.158 (talk) 08:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Formatting dispute
Relevant links listed here:


 * Demands for cessation of edits by Farahs51 on my talkpage


 * Request for assistance made by Farahs51 in Wikipedia:Editor assistance:


 * Request for a third editor User:Bhavesh.Chauhan to ask that I "not to make changes" to the said article.


 * My post explaining the changes I have made in Farahs51's talkpage:


 * Edit summaries where I have explained the changes:.

I present the above to let the facts do the talking. I rather do this then to debate with Farahs51 over whether I have explained and justified the changes I have made in a bid to improve the article in accordance to basic editorial guidelines and policies.--Huaiwei (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Update:
 * Threats of "Administrator Complaint Filed Against You" by Farahs51 in my talkpage
 * A potential editwar with her repeated removal of a tag to signify an ongoing unresolved dispute, and my restoration of the said tag --Huaiwei (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Suspected sockpuppeting:

Correction

Please to read the post that Huaiwei calls a threat, I have actually requested her not to make changes until it is reviewed by an administrator and an editor. I did tell ger that I have filed a complaint againts her, as she kept reverting the changes. After the first time she should have brought in an editor and should have known not to keep chaning and creating an edit war, as she is the older member on Wikipedia. As for the tag this article has been proferssionally written and is not from a fan point of view, I asked for proof of her statement which she was unable to provide. --Farahs51 (talk) 08:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Farah, allow me to reiterate once again points I have already clearly spelt out in your talkpage which you failed to respond directly to, instead choosing to go round in various places claiming I have not justified my edits. If I may present in more detail here:
 * Wikipedia is an open-source project editable by anyone. Unless editing privileges has been curtailed as part of dispute resolution, editors are free to edit any article as they please, as long as they follow wikipedia policies and guidelines, or do it with positive intentions to create a better wikipedia. Your constant demands that I stop editing in any form, including even adding warning flags, as well as your attempt to others to make similar demands against me is not considered a friendly gesture in just about any society, including in wikipedia. As per wikipedia policy, you do not own the article, just because you contributed much to it or feel strongly about the subject matter.
 * Second, even in a "semi-formal" request for a third opinion from uninvolved editors, there is no binding policy saying you have the right to actually stop one editor from editing only after "obtaining clearance" from another editor. I have mentioned it, and I mention it again. Administrators, let alone other editors, are not "content protectors" in this project. Wikipedia works by working towards WP:Consensus between all editors, not merely by what you and your friends say. I see scant evidence of you actually making a real effort to establish consensus and work things out, jumping straight to asking others for "help".
 * Third, tags signalling content issues in the article can be removed only when the dispute is resolved. For you to actually edit war with me over the inclusion of tags is ridiculous in my opinion, and speaks nothing about your intentions to genuinely consider outside opinion other than your own.
 * Now let's talk about the content issues itself (again):
 * All wikipedia articles follow the Manual of Style, which spells out in clear terms how articles are presented. Kindly read Lead section, which tells you clearly how you are supposed to present the leading paragraph (which does not include a floating quotation, nor an "introduction" heading), and Layout, which makes no mention of actually adding blank spaces between lines over supposed "readability" issues. Let it be known that removal of blank spaces is a built-in function in WP:AWB, which would generally mean it is an established formatting convention not normally contested. And yes, this is the first time in eight years I have ever heard of someone insisting on adding blank spaces for that kind of reasoning alone.
 * As a result of date links being removed as a result of recent discussions in Manual of Style (dates and numbers), it is now necessary to manually change date formats in accordance to [|full date formatting consistencies]. There is a need to ensure dates are consistent within all articles, which is why I launched the AWB in the first place. Second you insisted on using American date formats in the article. This contravenes this statement in the MOS: "Articles on topics with strong ties to a particular English-speaking country should generally use the more common date format for that nation". India officially and more commonly uses the dd/mm/yyyy format, as evidenced in and . It makes completely little sense for you to single-handedly insist on an alternative format at odds with other India-related articles which are being standardised according to a different format from what you prefer.
 * Finally, |Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, meaning it is not for unverifiable material, not a soapbox full of advertising or an opinion piece, and nor is it a place for your to publicly air your personal views on the subject matter. That section about "Fan's comments", in particular infringes on practically all of these, because firstly, WP:V dosen't just mean sourcing material from anywhere. Fansites, blogs, and such are generally not considered reliable sources. Secondly, the quotes are entirely unnecessary in an encyclopaedia meant to present objective information, not sell the said subject to potentially new fans. And third, comments by individual non-noteworthy fans is reflective of personal views. And why do you think I am hardly surprised when one of the quotes was written by someone called Farah? Rings a bell, Farah? Pure coincidence, or what?
 * It is with the collective concerns of the above in mind, that I felt compelled to act accordingly and add the relevant tags. And I am now suddenly concerned over the introduction of a new member who just reverted the page again in your favour. Allow me to warn, that creating multiple accounts by the same person, or asking another to create an account just to collaboratively disrupt wikipedia is deeply frowned upon and can cause you to be banned from this site. I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, in case you are unaware of some of wikipedia's conduct guidelines, but if I see this pattern once again, I will not hesitate to act accordingly.
 * One last thing, I am very much a piece of male organism. Kindly do not refer to me as a "she".--Huaiwei (talk) 10:18, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Career Section
When reading this section, it goes on...and on...and on...like a never ending Soap :D. Suggest we make it precise and to the point if at all there is any meat left in this section --Smet (talk) 16:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree wholeheartedly. It smacks of PR. Anyone with objections? Nshuks7 (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, so I was doing it when I realized 90% of this section can just be replaced with a filmography, which is already there. Hence, removing that 90%. If I happen to throw out any wheat with the chaff, please correct me. Nshuks7 (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Relatives info in Personal Info box
Hello,

I am not sure if Ketki Dave is Ram Kapoor's sister.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.206.239 (talk) 16:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Ram Kapoor
Hi Ram Kapoor: see you in a lifetime commitment TV, I very love — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:DA8:207:5092:50AA:FEA8:91D6:A8CB (talk) 01:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)