Talk:Ranfurly Shield

Untitled
The shield tally is wrong, Auckland have won the most, with Canterbury second — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.88.233 (talk) 00:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Shield Image
We should not be using an image of such dubious licensing and would be better to have no image until we have a free one. There can not be a fair use claim since the shield is frequently displayed in public so it should be easy to obtain a free photo of it. dramatic (talk) 11:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I do not know anything about wikipedia but would like to point out the ranfurlyshield.com link does not exist for anybody who cares to edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.112.14 (talk) 07:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Infobox
Does the infobox for this article seem entirely inappropriate? It seems to have been designed for league and cup competitions rather than a challenge shield. There are is no champion (simply a holder), not titles (just past holders, or "reigns"), and it wasn't "founded"!? I'm seriously considering removing it, but it would be better if I could replace it with something more appropriate. What do people think? - Shudde  talk 12:51, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Maybe something simple like this? - Shudde  talk 13:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)