Talk:Rape and pregnancy statement controversies in the 2012 United States elections

Comment
I am looking at the GA review of this article, and it doesn't go into any significant depth. The article appears to be a collection of two controversies under the same subject, made by those who oppose the view points of two GOP candidates during the 2012 election cycle. While I can see how each merit their own article per WP:EVENT, it still reads like an attack page against both individuals. This makes me wonder how this is neutral at all. If I were to reassess this for GA, it would fail on that point alone.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Article placed for reassessment. The link can be found here. Casprings (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121114215750/http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/steve-king-statutory-rape.php to http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/steve-king-statutory-rape.php
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120822075947/http://www.nydailynews.com:80/blogs/the_rumble/2012/08/todd-akin-paul-ryan-and-the-very-real-war-on-women to http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/the_rumble/2012/08/todd-akin-paul-ryan-and-the-very-real-war-on-women

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140110020329/http://seattletimes.com/html/politics/2019621624_elex1stcongdistrict07m.html to http://seattletimes.com/html/politics/2019621624_elex1stcongdistrict07m.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105005549/http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/11/records-show-ak.php to http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/11/records-show-ak.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Whether this article should exist
It appears to me that most of the sources used here speak particularly about specific comments made, and not about the comments taken together as a whole. The "Wider impact" section is good (though seems to be overstating what the reliable sources are actually saying), but I am wondering whether we are running afoul of WP:SYNTH by having an article that seems to place these comments together, where there is actually relatively little coverage linking them. Thoughts? DoomLexus (talk) 08:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)