Talk:Raygun Lounge

Food/drink, events
Hmm, Fram seems adamant about not including mention of food/drink options or past events, but they are mentioned in this version of the article for future reference, if helpful. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No idea why you insist on including absolute trivia in so many of your articles. Wow, they offer beer and organized a trivia night, good thing that this is available in the history of this page... Fram (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Eye roll... You've made your opinion known, let's move on. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I am reverting. The reason why this information should remain in the article is because reliable sources saw fit to report it. I can understand if someone wanted to challenge the legitimacy of the sources, but I hesitate to accept a rationale that Wikipedia editors should make editorial decisions that some content from reliable sources is appropriate and some is inappropriate. When professional writers for major media sources under strict editorial control make statements, then their words have weight.
 * I feel confident enough about this for this article that I would agree to escalation or calling for additional opinions.  Bluerasberry   (talk)  15:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, naan sandwiches, samosas and cider are not exactly standard fare. I say let's keep the detail. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * "professional writers for major media sources under strict editorial control", give me a break. You reinserted statements from multiple articles from the "Capitol Hill Seattle Blog", which states "On CHS, anybody can add to the site. You just need to login and start posting." Then there is this which hardly fits your description, and something like Curbed Seattle doesn't seem much better, and is a passing mention at best. I'm not going to revert, but the reasons given for this are really ridiculous. Fram (talk) 15:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm ok with Curbed being used. I use Eater (also by Vox Media) all the time on Wikipedia. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The editor who used the Curbed source, is OK with the Curbed source being used. In other news... Fram (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I was pointing out why I'm ok with Curbed being used. If you're against use of Curbed then you must also be against use of Eater? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, so media companies aren't able to have different publications / websites / ... with different standards, reliability, professionalism, ...? I haven't looked at Eater, but the status of Eater has no bearing on Curbed or vice versa. Anyway, "Curbed is an American real estate and urban design website", claims our article, so hardly a good site to use for reports on trivia nights in game lounges one would think, no? Fram (talk) 16:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * We'll have to agree to disagree. I'm moving on to other tasks. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

capitolhillseattle, the user generated local blog site, has been removed from the article. Fram (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)