Talk:Reactions to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis

Suggestion to correct title
I would suggest changing the article name to "Reactions to the 2021-2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis". It's grammatically correct - at least. No more elaborations are needed. PenangLion (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Reaction of the People’s Republic of China
China says the US is the ‘main instigator’ of the war in Ukraine - https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/10/china-accuses-us-as-main-instigator-of-the-war-in-ukraine

China hammers home its message of US blame for Ukraine war to domestic audience - https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3172228/china-hammers-home-its-message-us-blame-ukraine-war-domestic (Chinese gov’t owned news agency admitting this) Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Scholz-Putin press conference (2022-02-15).jpg

Name
@TankDude2000 I contest your move to "Reactions to the Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine". The current title is better. It is non-idiomatic to say "reactions to the prelude (of something)", and mildly nonsensical. The reactions were to concrete, individual, events during this period, which was afterwards characterized as the prelude. The title is also miscapitalized (Prelude). —Alalch E. 09:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Then revert the other page as well! TankDude2000 (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I won't. Perhaps other editors will agree with you that this article should be named something like "Reactions in the p relude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine". To this end, you may start a discussion per WP:RM.—Alalch E. 18:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)