Talk:Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft

opent content?
What's the copyright status of this? Could it be wikified? Mathiastck (talk) 19:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * First edition certainly, as it was printed in the mid 1800s. Any scans or links available? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.155.129.243 (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * On the German Wikisource already. It could use cleanup whenever you have time. — Llywelyn II   13:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm so meta even this acronym
It isn't particularly helpful that the li[nk] to Brill's New Pauly IN this article simply redirects BACK TO this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.65.99.218 (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the need to gloss the title
with something other than the English word "real", see here and here at the German StackExchange. — Llywelyn II   16:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Move
There are other Realencyclopädies besides this one but none remotely so famous. This is the, Realencyclopädie already redirects here, and the current German-orthography and partial form of only one version of the texts discussed in this article is silly. This general page should be moved to Realencyclopädie until the individual editions of this work have enough content added that they need their own separate titles. At that point, Wissowa's edition needs to have its Paulys restored to it. — Llywelyn II   16:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)