Talk:Reason Rally

Merge Discussion
There is no reason why these need to be separated out. CPAC is multi year but it never does this. We would need an admin to do a quick splice (not necessarily a good one) to preserve editing history. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 15:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No objection to merging the articles, if that is the consensus. Valerius Tygart (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 09:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see any objections in either of the talk pages... The 2016 article brings nothing new to merit its own article. (comment in merge section for both talk pages)--Fjmustak (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

cat
This isnt really the type of page that is meant for the cat.Apollo The Logician (talk) 16:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I disagree, as the content of the lead provides ample justification for the cats. But I am willing to listen to your explanation as to why you think that. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 21:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)