Talk:Rebbachisauridae

Merge proposals for Khebbashia and Rebbachisaurinae
Support: Per the discussion at WT:DINO, in an attempt to streamline the organization of higher-order clades, these merges are proposed for the following reasons: A Cynical Idealist (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) The articles to be merged are stubs.
 * 2) The articles to be merged are node-based clades with very little independent content that could be added in the foreseeable future to expand them. (WP:N)
 * 3) All of the information in these two articles are relevant to discussion of rebbachisaurid classification, which is already covered by the article Rebbachisauridae. (WP:REDUNDANT)
 * 4) "Rebbachisauridae" has over 450 results on google scholar vs only 11 for "Khebbashia" and 22 for "Rebbachisaurinae". In fact, a search for "Rebbachisaurinae" will return, "Did you mean 'Rebbachisauridae'?".  (WP:N)
 * 5) Similar sub-family-level taxa with low species counts already exist as solo articles (i.e. Pachycephalosauria, Heterodontosauridae, Megalosauridae, Alvarezsauridae, Oviraptoridae, etc.), and this merge would improve article format consistency for WP:DINO.


 * Support as per comments at WT:DINO.  LittleLazyLass  (Talk | Contributions) 20:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support per the above. Not much sense in having them all separate in their current states. -SlvrHwk (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)