Talk:Redneck Zombies

Neutrality?
God damn... You Wikipedia people and your obsession with tags and crap. I swear, nothing is ever good enough for you people. I fail to see where there is any "dispute" about the "Neutrality" of this article, seeing as there is, in fact, NO discussion about it. And even so, where's the problem with being "neutral"? Simply presenting the film as being "infamous" and "low budget"?

God forbid we ever have an article say something that's actually obviously true, without someone having to insist there be a "source" for it. Hey, the sky is blue. Do you need a source for that? See how ridiculous this logic is?

I swear that you people are just tag happy. You love to slap these ugly tags on anything and everything you can, and turn Wikipedia into a mess. The majority of "Wiki vandals" these days are vandals of a completly different sort. The type that slap tags on everything.

It's about as ugly as graffitti, and twice as distracting. Especially when they aren't even needed, or just slapped on something for the sheer fun of it.

The most hilarious thing, though, is the hypocrisy of it all. You say it yourself that "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale." And yet you people are anal enough to slap a "this article is disputed" tage, when there's no fucking debate anywhere to be seen.

This is a perfect example why Wikipedia has de-evolved into a bad joke, and is not much more than an anal-retentive clusterfuck of self-important geeks pretending to be relevant, all bumbling around, and can never agree on one single method on how to do anything with this site.

Often times, like this, the logic of Wikipedia "editors" is questionable at best, and pretty much, just laughable.

Why else would it be so damn important for people to go around slapping "disputed" tags on something that has zero discussion, and is, itself, claimed to be "low priority"?

I mean seriously... This kind of clusterfucked, illogical, inanity might make sense on popular pages that get visted all the time and have about 30 people editing it...

But on the "Redneck Zombies" page? ...Seriously??

For god's sake. Just let the foolishness sink in for a while, and tell me if the jury's still out afterwards.

Fair use rationale for Image:Redneck zombies-1-.jpg
Image:Redneck zombies-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair use rationale updated. --Northmeister 23:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Redneck zombies-1-.jpg
Image:Redneck zombies-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Jake The Butcher
I really wish they would change the spelling of my dad's last name, there is no T in our last name it is Albero, not Alberto and that used to make him so mad. Sadly he is passed away now but just thought I'd put it out there for my own peace of mind 2600:1006:B1A9:B18F:38BF:2C66:1954:779C (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)