Talk:Ren & Stimpy "Adult Party Cartoon"

"Stimpy's Pregnant" episode aired in the United States
This episode was aired in Michigan during the original run of the series. I have not edited the page because this is s personal experience without a citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.168.145 (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Cleanup
The supposed ep list sec'n is not an ep list. It includes a 5-item ep list, but that list fails to make clear what it is listing, and it is not the (apparent) first season that was actually broadcast. The two bullet points indented below the last of the five mention additional episodes, but they are prose, not list entries, and are not apparently in any sense subordinate to the list entry they are indented under. --Jerzy•t 19:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Yesterday was the 10th anniversary of the debut of "Ren and Stimpy Adult Party Cartoon." And "The Ren and Stimpy Show" is almost 22.
I wonder what John K.'s going to do... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.236.109 (talk) 21:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Merge
This page should be merged into The Ren & Stimpy Show, because it was a revival of the former show, not a spin off. Charles Essie (talk) 20:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Agreed.  11Block  | talk  12:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. "Merging should be avoided if the topics are discrete subjects warranting their own articles, even though they might be short" - Wikipedia: Merging: Reasons for merger. Despite sharing many characteristics, the revival/spinoff is distinct for being adult-oriented and very poorly-received. The APC article contains some original research and editorialized content that will have to be removed upon merger. IsaacAA (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You’re wrong, it’s completely different from the original and real show. The real Ren and Stimpy doesn’t have a reboot. The adult party cartoon it’s just a fake show of Spike TV. 188.172.111.241 (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Regarding the edits to the lead
I retrimmed the lead to the last stabilized version, but were reverted at least three times by an IP. In an effort to avoid an edit war and not risk violating WP:3RR, I'm taking this discussion here. Also, the rating (TV-MA) is not necessary to be included into the lead. I also think it should be trimmed down to the "the series was developed as an "extreme" revamp" wording as in previous pages. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)