Talk:Renee Hobbs

[Untitled]
Removed the NPOV template because there is no talk on this board about what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given.
 * Please don't remove maintenance templates without addressing and improving the concerns. Much of the content is repetitious, promotional in intent, and sourced mostly to the subject's own publications, rather than outside objective sources. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Removed NPOV template after adding information and citations from Ed Week, the Christian Science Monitor and the Concord (NH) Monitor newspapers to address concerns about the lack of outside objective sources.
 * I've restored the NPOV tag again. Many of the sources are still of the primary variety, and much of the content, therefore, appears to promote the subject's achievements via self-sourcing, rather than through objective outside references. This, in addition to the copyright violations that were removed, are of continuing concern, and indicate the likelihood of WP:COI. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)