Talk:Residents for Uttlesford

London Stansted
My recent edit was reverted by an individual who seems to have a great interest in this political party, to the point which I suspect that their neutrality may be somewhat compromised. The planning dispute between MAG and Uttlesford Council is a matter of public record and is noteworthy for the following reasons.

1. The Secretary of State reversed the council’s decision. 2. The appellate courts have examined the case. 3. Major trade unions and one of the U.K.’s largest airport operators have spoken publicly against the decisions of R4U.

Fair criticism of a party’s policies is worthy of being included in its Wikipedia article. The content was removed by an editor who appears to be the original author of this page. I respectfully suggest that it is likely that this person is a member or supporter of the party. LittleEye90 (talk) 22:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)