Talk:Rick Lax

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rick Lax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of this article:[edit]

I have qualms about the quality of this article. It reads as a promotion piece which is not what Wikipedia is for.

The article does not provide a lot of useful information; does not talk in neutral tone & cites poor sources. Could do with a good once over, with DOB and personal life added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musa acuminata (talkcontribs) 18:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I completely agree with the other two comments and complaints about this article. The following statement, for instance, is patently false, because there isn't a single video on his Facebook page that I can find with over a billion views in total, so suggesting videos get so many views on an average as well as monthly basis is beyond absurd; this has obviously been written by the man himself or as a puff piece by someone he paid to do it, then locked for editing on account of vandalism - he's not nearly important enough to warrant it otherwise and I'd never even so much as heard of him until today, and with good reason too, it would seem - so I can't even amend the egregious bits of it, such as: 'Lax also releases videos on Facebook, where they gain more than a billion views a month'. Wikipedia is not a promotional platform for puff pieces - badly done on this one. ≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:7DB7:C100:95AE:D0FC:8DB8:E836 (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2022[edit]

There should be a criticism tab on Rick Lax as he often will spread fake videos and hacks that can be potentially dangerous, very similar to 5 Minute Crafts 2603:6080:8901:700:F8E3:D3D8:E105:8734 (talk) 19:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]