Talk:Ring of Fire/Archive 1

Helpful
i'm doing a report and I would just like to thank you guys it's really cool and helpful sincerely, 4~4

First of all not helpful, but I am happy you made a good report. 2nd of all I found that the Ring of Fire is home to 75% of the world's volcanoes and 90% of its earthquakes. I found it on national geographic. Here is the link: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/earth/ring-of-fire/

Plagiarism
i'm doing a project on the ring of fire, and I was just on another site. This has almost word-for-word what that person wrote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.24.243 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 10 November 2006

216.174.135.164 20:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * What site? Most likely a mirror of Wikipedia or a copy of Wikipedia content. Vsmith 02:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

hey add xtra info
The ring of fire The Ring of Fire or the circus-Pacific (seismic) belt is a zone of frequent earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. 90% of the world’s earthquakes and 81% of the world’s biggest earthquakes happen along the Ring of Fire. Also the Ring of Fire is home to over 75% of world’s active and dormant (sleeping) volcanoes. The Ring of Fire stretches 40,000km around the Pacific and Nazca tectonic plates, along the boarders with the North/South-American, Eurasian, Philippine and Indy- Australian plates. You can find Hawaii exactly in the middle. Here you can see the position of the ring of fire in relation to the different plates and continents.

There are a lot of oceanic trenches (estrogen) and island arcs (island-groups positioned in a circle to each other) in the Ring of Fire. The trenches are because the Ring of fire is positioned on the tectonic boarders, this is where the different plates move against each other which can cause plates to move up or down. The island arcs are a result of big volcanoes the highest points of the volcano are in a circle, and when the volcano grows these points become islands. The main issues: the volcanoes and earthquakes are a result of the tectonic boarders: where there is a hole between the plates, volcanoes rise. And where the plates move towards and along each other, this causes vibrations. The Ring of Fire is a direct consequence of plate tectonics (shape of the plates) and the movement and collisions of these plates. For instance the eastern section of the ring is the result of the Nazca Plate and the Cocos Plate being pressed beneath the westward moving South American Plate. And there are a lot of other contacts with plates along the Ring of Fire. The southern part of the Ring of Fire is the most complex part, here there are collisions between a number of smaller tectonic plates and the Pacific plate from the Mariana Islands, the Philippines, Bougainville, Tonga, and New Zealand. Indonesia is especially dangerous because it lies between the ring of fire and the Alpide belt, the two worst, earthquake areas. The earthquake and tsunami in December 2004 near Sumatra were actually a result of the movements of the Alpide belt, and not of the Ring of Fire.

The Ring of Fire is home to a lot of volcanoes and mountains, these are: And these are far from all! There are 452 volcanoes in the Ring of Fire! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.169.204.100 (talk) 08:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC).
 * The Andes, and Cotopaxi and Azul volcanoes in South America. These were created by the Nazca plate colliding with the South American plate.
 * The Mexican volcanoes of Popocatepetl and Paricutun. A result of the little Cocos plate crashing into the North American plate. These volcanoes suddenly rose up from a cornfield in 1943.
 * The Cascades and the infamous Mount Saint Helens, between Northern California and British Columbia. Saint Helens erupted in 1980. These are created by the Pacific, Juan de Fuca, and Gorda plates.
 * Alaska's Aleutian Islands are growing as the Pacific plate hits the North American plate. The deep Aleutian Trench has been created at the subduction zone (where one plate slides above another) with a maximum depth of 7679 meters.
 * From Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula to Japan, the subduction of the Pacific plate under the Eurasian plate has created Japanese islands and volcanoes (such as Mt. Fuji).
 * The volcanoes in the New Guinea and Micronesian areas. These exist where the Indo-Australian plate subducts under the Pacific plate. The final section of the Ring of Fire exists where the Indo-Australian plate subducts under the Pacific plate and has created. Near New Zealand, the Pacific Plate slides under the Indo-Australian plate.

Um
um you guys dont have all the volcanoes of the ring of fire there is 452 --The previously unsigned comment was left by 207.200.116.202 on 22:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No one said we did. Add some if you'd like.  Incidentally, I'd like to know where you got the number 452 from. Urania3 01:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I think you should have more quotes on japan. --The previously unsigned comment was left by 24.2.23.54 on 14:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Uhm, why? Urania3 14:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

uhm, what is the ring of fire showing? is it showing where active volcanos are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.142.183.192 (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Why
Why is the ring of fire soooooo important other than having a bunch of earthquakes and vocanoes in it????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.208.151.204 (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Alaska
How come there are no mentions of Alaska in here? It only has a greater length of geography then the rest of the US in the Ring of Fire. Alyeska (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Pacific Rim/Ring of Fire?
So what's the difference between the Rim of Fire and the Ring of Fire? Are they just different names for the same thing? --Jack 14:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * One is a Political/Economic Zone, the other is a geological feature. Although they cover roughly the same geographical region - they are not the same thing. Australia is part of the Pacific Rim, but it is not on the Pacific Ring of Fire. Malathos 18:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Then perhaps this should be pointed out in the article, since "Pacific Rim of Fire" redirects here.--Jack 04:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I wasn't actually aware of that redirection, Now I see that Pacific Rim of Fire redirects to Pacific Ring of Fire - which is correct. My comments were in regard to the Pacific Rim - which is a separate article. Apologies for not reading your question correctly. There is no difference between Rim of Fire and Ring of Fire. The Pacific Rim (no fire) is the economic/political reference and correctly has it's own page. As you say, It may be worth putting a disambiguation at the top of the page to clarify matter

Yeah, this isn't enough information. It doesn't explain exactly what the ring of Fire is, how it got the name, anything. hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.234.100.113 (talk) 18:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * More info*

Papua New Guinea
Anyone know the extant of volcanic activity in this country? Enlil Ninlil (talk) 08:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

soufriere hills
Can someone tell me if the Soufriere Hills is located along the ring of fire please thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.233.16.182 (talk) 01:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC).


 * No, it is not.Fredwerner (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Sumatra and Java (Sunda Arc)
Surely Sumatra and Java i.e. the Sunda Arc, is not part of the Pacific Ring of Fire? The Indo-Australian plate subducts under the Eurasian plate, not the Pacific Plate, nor does the Sunda Arc border the Pacific basin. The Sunda Arc is the easternmost arm of the Alpide Belt, related to the Alpine Orogen. Paper:

"A new approach for preparation of quantitative seismicity maps as applied to Alpide Belt-Sunda Arc and adjoining areas."

"One such area is the circum-Pacific Ring of Fire, where the Pacific Plate meets many surrounding plates." - USGS It sounds silly to me as calling a Tsunami a Tidal Wave.--Diamonddavej (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Challenger Deep
I think Challenger Deep should be mentioned on this page because it is refereed to in the map - 10 February 2006 (date added by Hardscarf)


 * Challenger Deep added with this update. Urania3 07:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

UM.. who are you, where am i? How did i get here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.135.69 (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Date on picture should match the internal link info

 * This picture is from the North: [[Image:MSH82 st helens plume from harrys ridge 05-19-82.jpg|thumb]] --Chris.urs-o (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The date on the picture labels the Mount St. Helens eruption as July 22, 1980, but the internal Mount St. Helens page states the eruption occurred May 18, 1980. --2dlogans (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Global Volcanism Program (GVP), the eruption period started Mar 27, 1980, and ended Oct 28 ± 3 days, 1986. Quote from the image description: "After May 18th five more explosive eruptions of Mount St. Helens occurred in 1980, including this spectacular event of July 22nd...The view here is from the South." --Chris.urs-o (talk) 05:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reference of the continued activity there. However, the picture states it's July, but the peak is shown still intact.2dlogans (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * (ec)The first explosion of the eruption removed one side of the mountain, so there won't be any pictures of an erupting 'intact' volcano, I presume the photo in question was taken from the side unaffected by the blast of the 18th. Mikenorton (talk) 23:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Pacific Ring of Fire - Hawaii
The islands of  Hawaii should also  be  listed  as the territorial  area  of  Pacific  Ring of Fire! Hawaiian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.85.250 01:12, 12 March 2011
 * Disagree. Hawaii is a hotspot, the Pacific Ring of Fire is many subduction zones. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 06:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Indonesia part of the Pacific Ring of Fire?
A simple look at the world map and tectonic plates map indicate that it is inaccurate to claim that that the volcanoes of Indonesia and Indian Ocean rim are included in the Pacific Ring of Fire. These networks of volcanoes are most at the plate boundaries of the Indian-Australian, Phillipine, and Eurasian Plates, not the Pacific Plate. JD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.96.144 (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Clear consensus that this is the primary topic. Cúchullain t/ c 16:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

– Opinion at Talk:Ring of Fire (song) is that this is the primary topic. Pages that include the word Pacific AND the phrase "Ring of Fire" BUT NOT the phrase "Pacific Ring of Fire" = 1,770,000. Pages that do include the phrase "Pacific Ring of Fire" = 1,450,000. 92.41.193.73 (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pacific Ring of Fire → Ring of Fire
 * Ring of Fire → Ring of Fire (disambiguation)
 * The recent move request did NOT result in clear opinion regarding a primary topic. older ≠ wiser 15:54, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, per Britannica. Ring of Fire is the title of an IMAX video on this subject. Pacific Ring of Fire got 254,630 page views in the last 90 days, Ring of Fire (song) got 46,400. Kauffner (talk) 09:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, but can the hatnote at P.R.o.F.say "RoF links here. For the Johnny Cash song, see RoF (song).  For other uses, see RoF (disambig)", please, as it is far more likely a target than any of the others on that disambiguation page, and we want to help many "Ring of Fire" searchers better that way. Chrisrus (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree that if moved as requested, hatnote should link to both Ring of Fire (song) and Ring of Fire (disambiguation). 188.31.77.99 (talk) 12:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Oppose Pacific Ring of Fire is a perfectly acceptable name for the article, and (disamiguation) should only be used when there is no clear delineation available.  GimliDotNet ( Speak to me,  Stuff I've done )  09:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You think disambiguation pages should take priority over articles? Who wants to read a DAB page? Kauffner (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree with Kauffner. Note that The Ring of Fire already redirects to Pacific Ring of Fire, not the dab page. 188.31.77.99 (talk) 12:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The rules for disambiguation pages are quite clear (disambiguation) should not appear unless there is a primary topic that needs that exact name, Pacific Ring of Fire does not. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me,  Stuff I've done )  07:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Please agree that,
 * Support per talk:Ring of Fire (song) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, with caveat If “Ring of Fire” -> Pacific Ring of Fire, then Pacific Ring of Fire should have a hatnote saying:
 * “Ring of Fire” redirects here. For the Johnny Cash song, see Ring of Fire (song).  For all other uses, see Ring of Fire (disambiguation).
 * This should more efficiently reroute any misdirected traffic. Chrisrus (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If you mean......then I agree. 92.41.55.17 (talk) 02:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC) (previously 92.41.193.73)
 * That's great; thanks!  ✅Chrisrus (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that the redirect is from The Ring of Fire, not Ring of Fire. I have corrected the hatnote. 92.41.55.17 (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Support, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This is one of those cases where the usage statistics reflect long-term significance, and why I believe long-term significance should not have to ever be given direct consideration, because, when it's really long-term significant, the users show that in their usage.  --B2C 01:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.