Talk:Rizelmine

Marriage
Did Rizel and Iwaki get married? I was under the impression that they would marry when they got older because of the line "It'll be in the far future, but let's go together to register it this time." when Iwaki gave Rizel the marriage form.(quote from a fansubbed episode, by Honobono, I think?) In the ending credits they had them as 1 year later but they did not say anything about them being married. (Unless this happens in the manga and not the anime series, which I did not happen to read?)--Amarei 00:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot of anime series don't complete what the manga does. Tyciol (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Lolicon
Was the term lolicon used in volume one of the manga? --Mr.Taka 19:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That's hard to say, what would the symbol look like that written in kanji or katakana? Someone could look for it. Tyciol (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Tokyopop's genre is Romance with an age rating of 13+ this does not really fall under being a loli unless the Japanese version is much diffrent. - Knowledgekid87 (talk)
 * A long time later... Yes, the term "lolicon" is used twice in the Tokyopop translation. Both times it means a person who likes young girls (see Lolicon for more information about the different meanings of the term). Both times, Iwaki's classmates accuse him of being a "lolicon" beause Rizel is all over him and is very affectionate. The term is of course completely inaccurate for him; he doesn't like young girls, but older women -- in fact, the plot hinges on that fact. It appears on pages 43 and 53. Timothy Perper (talk) 23:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Fixing it up
I've been trying to fix this up a bit. What do you think? Hikari Tajiri (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks great! For someone just finding out about this series, it is a great guide. I wonder where to find the second season mostly :) Tyciol (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Review(s)

 * ANN:, , Manga
 * THEM Anime:
 * Mania.com: Manga
 * The review of the manga in the ANN Right Turn Only column is not a professional review, but a review sent in by a reader of the column. While the author of the column probably screens the reader reviews for some level of competent writing, I do not think a review by a non-professional counts as a reliable source.  I've therefore removed that review as a source in the article. Calathan (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)