Talk:Robert B. Laughlin

Anon edits
Two anons have made clumsy edits which need to be checked and cleaned up or removed. Note that, aka the snfc21.pacbell.net anon, and , aka the pltn13.pacbell.net, are both suspected socks of Jack Sarfatti, who has been permabanned from editing the WP. ---CH 00:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Edit of 9-20-08
In the second paragraph, I removed the last phrase from the sentence "In the period of 2004-2006 he served as the president of KAIST in Daejeon, South Korea, a tenure full of controversy." Since there was no other mention of any "controversy" and no reference, I found it prudent to remove the allegation. I did a GNews search for articles from 2006 with the string "laughlin kaist" and found several entries seeming to support a controversy. Sadly, many were behind paywalls and the rest were in Korean. So while there may have been a legitimate controversy surrounding Laughlin's tenure at KAIST, I cannot currently find sources to corroborate. JFlav (talk) 18:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Color picture?
.. would be nice as long as he is not dead yet (I hope:). Richiez (talk) 10:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Fedora (Linux) recognition
Since a release of Fedora Linux is being named after him (Fedora 14) in recognition of his work...should that be added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmaxel94 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

"book seems to be about energy not about climate"
If it is not about climate, why is is called Laughlin on the Future of Carbon and Climate?

Russ Roberts is not a reliable source on anything scientific. He is an economist and market fundie, and he interviews notorious denialists like Matt Ridley and Bjørn Lomborg. Never use him as a source when the word "climate" is used. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I misread what you removed, and have now undone my undo. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 15:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * But I should remind you that WP:BLP applies on talk pages and as a general rule you should not make disparaging comments about unrelated individuals on this page. Jonathan A Jones (talk)
 * Those are not disparaging. If I am not allowed to call unreliable sources unreliable here, Wikipedia fails. You made me give up on categories (see here), but you will not make me give up on articles. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)