Talk:Rod Lurie

Untitled
Criticism

i think his work deserve criticism for his strong bias shown throught his work. i have improved the criticism section to show proof of this and to make it to the point. --Crt101 02:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

While not disputing that the issue of bias ought be addressed, my complaints concerning the current draft are twofold: no citations are provided supporting the criticism, and no rebuttals to the criticism are offered. --Silvermint 12:05, 24 June 2006 (CST)

i have improved my orginal work by putting in more evidence as well as a citations to my point, i decided to place the item for disscusion as my previous attemptes to place critisim have been met with vandals removing the piece without disccusion. if anybody wish to rebutt my work, i welcome the chance to prove my point.--Crt101 01:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Your "original work" has no place on Wikipedia. Nice try though. Sandeylife (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I rewrote the section in an attempt to remove POV, several spelling errors, and what was pretty obviously Crt101’s opinion. You can’t state criticisms as fact. You can only state that the criticism exist. For example, you can’t write, “Rod Lurie is a left-wing propagandist.” You can however write, “The New Republic called Rod Lurie a left-wing propagandist.”  (Provided, of course, the person you’re citing actually said that and you cite your source for the quote).


 * No, you can't. You are wrong. Nice try though. Sandeylife (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm leaving the NPOV tag up because more work on this article needs to be done. I think someone should add rebuttals if any are available. Jim Campbell 22:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree, this article is a complete disaster area. Sandeylife (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)