Talk:Rodriguez v. United States

Proposed Revision
Newest editions seem speculative and push an obvious bias upon an otherwise laudable stub of an article. I propose a revision to remove speculation as to why the decision was made; at best it only hits on a guess as to the inner machinations of the judicators' minds, at worst it seemingly takes a stance on the case that may push an outside agenda; there should be no op-eds on Wikipedia.

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.78.6 (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Agreed. The commentary and analysis section seems undoubtedly biased; using citations that either no longer exist or are from a sensationalized news article that leans closer to an opinion article. CaptainGummyBearz (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)