Talk:Roger & Val Have Just Got In

Tone
Much too POV. Needs serious editing. Lee M (talk) 02:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed there was too much information before, but now there's not enough! Lee M (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Could have come from the BBC's own website
really? this is not a description of the show this is a bbc advert i love the bbc (not this show) but wikipedia should be better than this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.151.59 (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

I completely agree; I think the introduction bit should be included as part of a reception bit (if it is simply excerpted from a public review rather than a private opinion). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.189.54 (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Some attempts to fix...
I've fixed up some problems (promotional waffle, repetition, language errors) I could see with this article. It keeps getting undone by one particular editor. I'm probably just going to leave it alone, but if anyone else'd like to step in, please do. killy mcgee (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)