Talk:Roland Juno-106

Why the Juno has an analog signal path
The previous intro speculated that the Juno had an analog signal path including analog filters because of a perceived better sound offered by same. I am reluctant to have this included without citation. I re-read the 106 user manual and service manual recently and see no mention of this perceived benefit, so I am doubtful that it was intended this was. It is possible that there are citations in the marketing literature of which I am unaware. Please let me know if this is the case.

I suspect that the main reason for the analog signal path was that at the time the Juno 106 was designed analog signal paths were still cheaper to build. The Juno would have had to have a much faster CPU in order to support the kind of DSP required for digital filtering, and in fact even the shaping of the pulse and saw waves are analog on this instrument. Tshb (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

The Juno-106 today
Someone added a lot of very unencyclopedic information to this paragraph, obviously copied from an explanation about how to fix defective Juno-106's. This really needs clean-up; it makes the whole article look bad. 84.198.246.199 (talk) 04:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Juno Synthesizers
Do you think there should be more documentation about the relationship (i.e. similarities and differences between the Juno-60 and Juno-6? Nimajnib (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)