Talk:Rowland Brown

Original research?
Much of this article appears to consist of original research and speculation by a single editor, whose userpage declares, "I have done extensive research on Rowland Brown, his work, his critics, his reputation and his influence." I'm afraid that much of this editor's work on the article contravenes Wikipedia's no-original-research policy (WP:NOR). Many sections contain very few citations, and most of those citations appear to be intended to support the editor's arguments rather than to name independent sources for the material. I'm afraid that the article appears to call for a severe pruning, down to well-sourced factual material, with speculations and rumors re-added only as they can be backed by citations to reliable sources. Ammodramus (talk) 20:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)