Talk:Roy Lichtenstein

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roy Lichtenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112021548/http://www.richardgraygallery.com/exhibitions/2010-10-30_roy-lichtenstein/ to http://www.richardgraygallery.com/exhibitions/2010-10-30_roy-lichtenstein/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111226165855/http://tacomaartmuseum.org/page.aspx?hid=374 to http://www.tacomaartmuseum.org/page.aspx?hid=374

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roy Lichtenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100120010003/http://www.lichtensteinfoundation.org/solexint.htm to http://www.lichtensteinfoundation.org/solexint.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120623193933/http://www.lichtensteinfoundation.org/madindex.htm to http://www.lichtensteinfoundation.org/madindex.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Internal Link Not Working
The link to "Ohh...Alright..." in the table "Roy Lichtenstein sales records" is broken. The actual page is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohhh...Alright...

Trophonius326 (talk)


 * ✅ thanks! DBaK (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2020
Spelling mistake 90.253.130.130 (talk) 08:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: as you have not identified the specific change required - what is the mistake? and where is it on the page? - Arjayay (talk) 09:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If it was "Septepmber" - I have now corrected it - Arjayay (talk) 09:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Seascape, by Roy Lichtenstein, 1965, Philadelphia Museum of Art.jpg

Allegations of copying/theft
Quite a bit of media is publishing criticism of Lichtenstein and his “appropriation” of comic images for his art. I believe it’s valid enough to be mentioned in the article, but not sure if a separate “Controversies” section would be too much? https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/apr/09/new-allegations-of-plagiarism-against-roy-lichtenstein —Chimino (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * "Controversies" sections are discouraged by wikipedia style guides. My feeling is that we should wait to see if anything comes of these legal issues before adding anything to avoid to much rumour and back-and-forth in the text. Ashmoo (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, the issues are moral/ethical rather than legal. There is a documentary film on this and articles in the Washington Post and numerous art and comic sites in addition to the Guardian linked above. Here's one example, with a podcast on the topic: https://news.artnet.com/multimedia/the-art-angle-podcast-how-roy-lichtenstein-became-a-super-villain-to-comic-book-artists-2284371
 * In my view, the arguments are misguided and often peppered with misinformation. but there is enough of this coverage that it will attract readers here in search of more info. This probably should be addressed in the article somehow. BTfromLA (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)