Talk:Royal British Columbia Museum

a note about those photo requests
Just checked the article, 'Old Town' does not refer to the area of downtown Victoria north of Johnson St, but to an internal display of the RBCM. So both this and the 'Century Hall' photo requests strike me as needing permission from the RBCM to photograph for the purposes of this encyclopedia. I'm not sure about that; visitor photographs may qualify, but there may be a copyright on the display that should be looked into.Skookum1 (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * In Canada, Freedom of Panorama applies to art works on permanent display, so I don't think copyright would apply. No different than the wooly mammoth photos already included in the article. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

New section
(Royal BC Museum)

Thank you to everyone who has contributed to the Royal British Columbia Museum's Wikipedia page. This page is rather out of date, however, and we have some requested changes. I am the Communications Specialist at the Royal BC Museum. Most of the updated information is from our collection managers and curators.

Second paragraph: - request two instances of "exhibits" be replaced with "exhibitions" - request "Vikings and BC's gold rushes" be added to list of previous exhibitions - request "The museum's IMAX theatre shows educational films as well as commercial entertainment" be changed to "The Royal BC Museum partners with and houses the IMAX Victoria theater, which shows educational films as well as commercial entertainment." (The Royal BC Museum does not own IMAX)
 * ✅ Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Third paragraph: - The two sentences relating to the summer satellite gallery in Vancouver's Chinatown are out of date. Request they either be replaced with or added to with "The Royal BC Museum extends its reach beyond Victoria with travelling exhibitions and national and international partnerships. In 2015, the travelling Species at Risk exhibition visited BC's Lower Mainland and Okanagan Valley, bringing with it information on the province's endangered species. Also in 2015, the Royal BC Museum opened two exhibitions in China: one at a Guangzhou metro station, the other at the Guangdong Museum of Chinese Nationals Residing Abroad." (References: http://royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/assets/2015-10-28-Guangzhou-Metro-opening-FINAL.pdf, http://royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/assets/2015-11-05-China-Gold-opening-FINAL.pdf)
 * , condensed for brevity. Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Permanent Galleries: - the name of one of the galleries has changed. Request all "Modern History Gallery" references be changed to "Becoming BC"
 * ❌: Can I get a second confirmation on this? The museum's own website calls it the Modern History Galleries Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Natural History Gallery: - The "mirco climate theatre in the gallery that plays an animated film be Science North" is no longer there. Request this sentence be removed. - The "Ocean Station" no longer "involves a simulated journey to the depths of the ocean." Request this reference be removed.
 * ✅ Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Modern History Gallery: - please change heading and all repeat references to "Becoming BC"
 * ❌, same as above. Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

First Peoples Gallery: - "Bill Reid's photography is also available for viewing" is inaccurate. Please replace with "Bill Reid's argillite carvings are also available for viewing." - "The gallery has been criticized by indigenous scholars for its portrayal of First Nations people and its use of controversial images and film from Edward Curtis." This is one-sided and outdated. Request change to "Internationally, there are ongoing analyses and critiques of all museum representations of First Peoples, and the Royal BC Museum's exhibits are situated within that large and complex dialogue."
 * altered the sentence on Bill Reid. Did not remove the criticism. The sentence in question is sourced, and I am not convinced that just because the criticism is outdated, it should be removed. Wikipedia articles often sum up the history of an institution, not just what it does today. If there is a reason why the criticism is no longer valid, my opinion is that it would be better to add a second sentence explaining the change. The problem with your proposed sentence is that it tries to disperse what was a specific controversy with the museum into a wider dialectic regarding portrayals of First Peoples. "Large and complex dialogue" is an unspecific phrase that doesn't tell the reader why Royal BC Museum is involved within this controversy, whereas the previous wording does.

Archaeology: - request "192 000 artifacts" be updated to "220,000 artifacts"

Palaeontology: - request "55 000 specimen" be updates to "70,000 specimens."

Botany: - request "200 000 speciments" be updated to "210 000 specimens"

Entomology: - request "approximately 245 000 accessioned specimens and another 150 000 specimens not yet accessioned" be updated to "approximately 400,000 accessioned specimens and another 150,000 specimens not yet databased."

Mammalogy: - request "18 000 specimens" be updated to "25,000 specimens"
 * ❌, for all the specimen counts. Could you provide citations for each of these statistics? Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Learning and Education: - request "Christmas Open House at Helmcken House" be replaced with "Father Christmas"
 * There seem to be several Christmas events that happen at Helmcken House, including both Father Christmas and the Old-Fashioned Christmas. I simply added a note to that effect. Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Publishing and Publications: - request these books be added: "Lohman, Jack. Museums at the Crossroads? Essays on Cultural Institutions in a Time of Change. Victoria: Royal BC Museum, 2013.", "Lohman, Jack. Treasures of the Royal BC Museum and Archives. Victoria: Royal BC Museum, 2015.", "Van Tol, Alex. Aliens Among Us: Invasive Animals and Plants in British Columbia. Victoria: Royal BC Museum, 2015.", "Ford, John K. B. Marine Mammals of British Columbia. Victoria: Royal BC Museum, 2014." and "Bridge, Kathryn. New Perspectives on the Gold Rush. Victoria: Royal BC Museum, 2015."
 * ✅ Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

If possible, please add "Awards" section with the following information:

•	Number 1 in TripAdvisor’s list of Top 10 Museums in Canada – 2014, 2015 •	Expedia: one of the five Best Canadian Museums – 2015 •	27th Annual American Alliance of Museums Excellence in Exhibition Competition winner for Our Living Languages: First Peoples’ Voices in British Columbia – 2015 •	Multicultural Award Winner (Province of BC): Multicultural Excellence in Government – 2015 •	Finalist, Governor General's History Award for Excellence in Museums: History Alive! for Our Living Languages: First Peoples’ Voices in British Columbia – 2015 •	Keck Award winner– 2014 (for conservation of the Chinese Freemason’s Lantern) •	BC Museums Association Award of Merit winner – 2012 (for the exhibition “Aliens Among Us”) •	BC Museums Association Award of Merit winner – 2002 (for collaborating on the respectful handling, documentation and research of BC’s “iceman”) •	One of Canada’s Top 100 Employers – 2008, 2010 •	One of BC’s Top 55 Employers – 2008 through 2013
 * ❌ Adding this many awards is rather promotional, and is unusual for Wikipedia's articles about museums. For example, neither Canada_Science_and_Technology_Museum nor Royal_Ontario_Museum have a list of awards. Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking the time to read this and considering our requests. Any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Cheers.

KyleBWells (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Kyle. Thanks for your patience with this edit request&mdash;the editors of Wikipedia are processing a backlog of 130+ edit requests. Some of your edits have been approved and some have been declined. It would help if you provided more sources to support the items I declined above, preferably articles from organizations that are not connected to the museum. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Royal British Columbia Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20131214170302/http://142.36.5.21/ to http://142.36.5.21/
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20131214170229/http://142.36.5.21/upperfraserbasin/index.html to http://142.36.5.21/upperfraserbasin/index.html
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20131214170228/http://142.36.5.21/upperfraserbasin/events.html to http://142.36.5.21/upperfraserbasin/events.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100217014654/http://www.bcarchives.bc.ca/bcarchives/default.aspx to http://www.bcarchives.bc.ca/bcarchives/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Capsology 101
The collections are divided into eight disciplines: Entomology, Botany, Palaeontology, Ichthyology, Invertebrate Zoology, Herpetology, Mammalogy, and Ornithology.

As I understand conventions pertaining the capitalization, departments are capitalized (along with many other forms of titles and specific proper nouns), but disciplines should not be.

Hence the sentence above should either read:

The collections are divided into eight [discipline-based] departments: Entomology, Botany, Palaeontology, Ichthyology, Invertebrate Zoology, Herpetology, Mammalogy, and Ornithology.

Or it should read:

The collections are divided into eight disciplines: entomology, botany, palaeontology, ichthyology, invertebrate zoology, herpetology, mammalogy, and ornithology.

For myself, I find these extra capitals pompous and unpleasant to wade through.

Or, put in other terms: man-spreading, meet mortar-board spreading, i.e. "Philosophy" is just plain old "philosophy" determined to occupy three full adjacent seats. &mdash; MaxEnt 21:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)