Talk:Royal Mercian and Lancastrian Yeomanry

Possible renaming
http://www.dudleynews.co.uk/news/10524279.print/

Scottish and North Irish Yeomanry

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Royal Mercian and Lancastrian Yeomanry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060909043147/http://www.regiments.org:80/regiments/uk/volmil-england/vcav/4MercLan.htm to http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/volmil-england/vcav/4MercLan.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Royal Mercian and Lancastrian Yeomanry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080920142545/http://www.army.mod.uk:80/armoured/regiments/1639.aspx to http://www.army.mod.uk/armoured/regiments/1639.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Lineage error for the 22nd Lancashire RVC
Hello,

In the lineage table the 22nd Lancashire Rifle Volunteer corps that became 6th Volunteer Battalion, The Manchester Regiment is is given as raised in 1860. That however was another 22nd Lancs. RVC. It consolidated in the 1st Lancashire RVC in 1861 already. The 22nd Lancs. RVC that became 6th VB, The Manchester Regiment was a post 1880 (consolidation and renumbering) unit and raised in 1882.

Now, I can of course simply edit that 1860 into 1882, but I did not want to do that without explanation.

Henk-wkp (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)