Talk:Runic inscriptions

Perhaps reduce scope to Elder Futhark inscriptions. THe Younger Futhark corpus should be treated at Runestone, or else in a standalone article. --dab (𒁳) 09:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Now I have moved it I think this was a bad idea, and perhaps Runic inscriptions was better. I suppose this will depend on how the article develops further. --dab (𒁳) 14:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)