Talk:Rupert Degas

Untitled
Oops. I just reverted a change to Rupert Degas, and muddled up the details in my edit summary. Clarifying here just in case anybody noticed the inconsistency.

Somebody had changed birth date to 1960 in the article. IMDB says birth date is 1970, and he played a "schoolboy" role in 1985, and played a "student" role in 1992. Therefore I think 1960 is a pretty unlikely birthdate and I reverted article to the previous 1970 version.

Unfortunately I got this wrong way round in my edit summary, saying "Hence birth in 1970 seems improbable, reverting to 1960". If you saw this and were baffled, it's my fault, sorry. If you never noticed the edit summary, you can ignore all this :-)

Bobrayner (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, no worry - thanks for the correction. The date was definitely correct, as I think the subject started the article himself a few years ago anyway! Bob talk 22:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Bibliography of works
It is standard on Wikipedia to list the works created by an artist. It is why they are notable, as creative professionals, their works. We list books by authors, acting roles by actors, albums and songs by musicians, painter exhibitions, etc.. as for sourcing, we could track down individual sources for each work to prove they in fact did this thing, but then the article will have dozens of spammy sources and look like a COI case and that would be not be helpful. Rather we can link to a single primary source, Degas's website, to verify they did this work. Primary is acceptable for basic facts: they appeared in a film or made an audiobook, we do this sort of thing all the time to help with verification. If there is some reason to believe Degas's website is unreliable, then it would not be a reliable source, but someone would need to show evidence why we can not trust the site for these particular facts. Again, we use primary sources all the time for basic facts. -- Green  C  16:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)