Talk:Ruselectronics

Sanctions
This is now a sanctioned entity and so a section has been added to address this, though perhaps more information could be pulled from the sanctions list to indicate what this means.148.252.146.215 (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Mods asleep at the wheel
If I edit a section it is automatically flagged up as the mods seem to want to preserve the content that promotes this sanctioned Russian 'firm'. Wikipedia is key in spreading this disinformation.

My edits were rejected because they would not allow me to change the context from a cataloguing of the entity to a sufficient description whereby it was stated that there was little to mention of it as it is effectively defunct, anachronistic and absorbed by the Russian state to the point of not being externally recognisable, and nobody internally capable of recognising it other than for propaganda purposes.

I have been at great pains to explain the situation to the mods regarding Russia and yet they don't revert their section blanking.

In Lehman's terms I'm being asked 'why did I blank a sanctioned Oligarch' and clearly the mods have done this to frustrate me and I think law enforcement will be on to them for their attitude and the trove of dangerous articles they now keep on Russia. The mods clearly possess an education capable of supplying themselves with the insight, so it is telling that they have used it here for harm rather than good. As I reiterate, the mods have left up multiple articles on sanctioned entities, refused to acknowledge the change in Russia, and left business information for sanctioned entities such as their websites, not least all the previously published business and R&D activities. At what point do we draw the line and say Wikipedia is greying into involvement with these companies, and thinks it's too big to be stopped. The other side of things is it seems Wikipedia is a sham, right down to the office and shows a bad side of America where it is based. I don't think the president can afford to project that kind of image and therefore I think this is acting against American interests, so prepare for a takedown any time soon. It has long been in the waiting. When the governments finally act and acknowledge that Wikipedia has become a vital resource for terrorists, recruiters of terrorists, sanctioned entities and those stupid enough to do business with them, then I wonder whether anyone will visit the office, I wonder if the mods will fear turning their computers on because they've got the stench on them. The stench is currently on them. But where did it come from?

And to clarify, I have no intention of reading through the information provided by Wikipedia on these technology companies. Why? Because they are sanctioned and irrelevant, so therefore the articles on them are irrelevant. The only audience with an interest would be national security and in some cases journalists and the governments themselves. I don't want to log on to a Wikipedia that is forcing me to divert away from this stuff because I'm not a government employee (heaven forfend) or a member of the press. Yet those very institutions have their own data stores and don't need Wikipedia like this.

I for one don't need the time. Reverting the edits is a waste of time, and pretending they were not well thought out is arrogant. This clearly is a deliberate attempt to squat as a mod on Wikipedia to promote drivel, and illegal content. If nobody wants to edit the content (and they don't) then clearly it needs taking down. It is the same content as was up in 2021, or earlier, and often was not appropriate to be on the site back then. It is repeatedly content that glorifies invasion, the tactics used to invade, relating to a current illegal invasion, and is supporting the notion that there are companies that still exist even now that have business interests and research interests despite being controlled by a dictatorship regime, at present. I say wait and see what happens in the world and see if it's relevant to talk about the scientific interests and web addresses of Russian chemical companies, Russian heavy industry and electronics companies. One thing I know, if you keep talking about it now you will be seen as having a role in it. If you harm the interests of your own country that's treason, if it's a threat to national security.

I can see what you're doing with this. HELLAS1990 in January of this year continued to trawl up content from the internet, from a Russian source, detailed the military developments of the company Ruselectronics. This information is clearly a use as a catalogue to rogue individuals wishing to do trades with this ghost company, this anachronism for the R&D side of the Putin war machine. On this basis it satisfies me that there are very ill people and some people breaking the law who are mods or contributors and that sometimes (in this case I expect so) fully aware that they are acting at best recklessly in regards to promoting terrorism and at worst actively sliding into promoting it. I'm no fool. I can see what you've been doing. You haven't contributed in this section all these years, the last few years, or ever, and now anyone chooses to bring Wikipedia into compliance with international law, you go and stomp on the attempt to do so. So with this I have concerns you are terrorists and have facilitated the war in Ukraine. Maybe you thought you were the mouthpiece of the people. The people were mad, their leaders made sense (and indeed were democratically elected in order to cope with social disorder when it arises, as it clearly does from time to time and some say inevitably) and you refused to go along with them. You will find you are wrong, history will not be on your side and you will be sectioned out for all kinds of legal scrutiny, you'll be forced to be sectioned, the public will come to hate you, law enforcement will do nothing to protect you as you've broken the law. You've broken Wikipedia's founding principles, its right to operate and you're going to have to be superseded, else Wikipedia will go down. Either that or nobody will be informed, get their information elsewhere, and you'll be sat there tinkering pretending you didn't know the nature of the articles on Wikipedia and don't 'get involved' with the serious stuff. Only you won't quit. You can't have part of a job and not do the rest. Sooner or later mateys you're fired, either before or after law enforcement, the mob, whoever, catches up with you. One thing's for sure, if you're outside the law, the law's responsibility to protect you is diminished. It must have been worth it eh? I won't let you get away with this. You can keep your genocidal ways, and we'll know it was you. People will be on to you. You won't have protection from those you think you're working for outside of the foundation. Snap out of it now. Keep your chin up if you do. You're going to need to have all the respect you can get after what has happened here, so grasp it when you get the chance.

What have we learnt here tonight? Idealism doesn't bring about realism in the adult world. Being unrealistic doesn't bring about change, unless you're lucky enough to be molly-coddled by those the other side of the divide, and then people will question whether you are an honourable individual, an adult even, instead a freeloader corrosive to the very element of things such as social cohesion, peace and freedom. So, to summarise, where are we at here? If I have to re-edit every article line by line to escape your botted'ness I will do that. If I have to keep getting IP address I will do that. If I keep having to highlight what you've done here in dialogues like this then I shall, every bit as long as here.

If I have to take the matter off the website when you're breaking the law, I shall at least bring to the attention of the public that this website exists and it is being used in this way. If it becomes apparent that you're untrackable, untraceable, operating cross borders manipulating the foundation's management then it won't go forgotten. You are supposed to be facilitating a website where anyone, anywhere, with a reasonable understanding of the situation can modify and create an article entry, provided they are doing so legally and it is in the public interest what they are doing, and you have not done that here tonight. Multiple of you mods within minutes came to the rescue of sanctioned categorisations, sanctioned threats and re-potted them so they were right away back to posing public danger in the form that was intended from the maniacs that dreamt this situation up. They will go down but you will have to keep trying to justify your blithe support for them, that you showed just so you could get that feeling of having a power buzz. It was in nobody's interests. It was satisfying an itch you developed in obtaining mod privilege, presumably years back when the world was different and this is your way of pretending it hasn't changed, that you can bring back people from the dead, etc, you can't, you can't.

Name inconsistency
Please move the article to "Ruselectronics" per https://rostec.ru/en/about/companies/159/.

This is the appropriate spelling, and dispels confusion caused by an incorrect title. I'm not sure how to do it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.64.226.165 (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)