Talk:Rutherford model

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Rutherford model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060502124241/http://www.rwc.uc.edu:80/koehler/biophys/7a.html to http://www.rwc.uc.edu/koehler/biophys/7a.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060902103523/http://www2.kutl.kyushu-u.ac.jp:80/seminar/MicroWorld1_E/Part2_E/P25_E/Rutherford_model_E.htm to http://www2.kutl.kyushu-u.ac.jp/seminar/MicroWorld1_E/Part2_E/P25_E/Rutherford_model_E.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Blunder
What is the blunder of Rutherford's atomic nature Max Yusuf (talk) 04:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Chemistry
Niel Bohr model of atom 197.215.27.63 (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @197.215.27.63 why alpha particle was not difflected by electrons? Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

3D animation of an atom
The 3D animation is vastly distorted for the purpose of this article. The nucleus is 20,000 to 60,000 times smaller than the electron cloud. See Atomic nucleus. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)