Talk:SAT-3/WASC

Damage?
Damaged how? --82.41.210.128 (talk) 18:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Unknown as of this posting (at least not known from a reliable source). I did find a quote in this article that hints at a possible fault in the Benin branch of the cable.  However, I wonder if we will see a significant drop in email scams from Nigeria. Dr Clement Okon and his associates must be worried, hmm? ++68.187.205.80 (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

hi
this is so geeky! and look at all the little edit buttons you guys have! i don't even know how many cable systems there are but there must be thousands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gutenberg Forever (talk • contribs) 03:09, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Upgrade now live: 340 Gbps (SAT-3) and 440Gbps (SAFE)
References:
 * Sat-3 upgrade completed, new cables on track
 * SAT-3/SAFE bandwidth capacity tripled —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefishy (talk • contribs) 12:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on SAT-3/WASC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090802185950/http://www.fudzilla.com:80/content/view/14863/1 to http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/14863/1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * SAFE-SAT3-WASC-route.png