Talk:Sabine Hossenfelder

14 June 2018 06:14
Thousands of physicists not in wikipedia have better citation records than http://inspirehep.net/author/profile/S.Hossenfelder.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigt088 (talk • contribs) 06:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * This has already been discussed and it was decided unanimously to keep the article and that there were enough citations.[] Bigt088- why are you setting up a single-purpose account for this? Volunteer1234 (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I would personally like to see some references to her work on 'superdeterminism', and so include mentions of her associated academic paper and online articles. The reason for picking on this particular subject is that she's one of the few physicists to openly support it. It's a valid theory with untapped (in academia) consequences. TonyP (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Superdeterminism mentions her. Perhaps that's better for quoting from her work (https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01324)? There's much discussion of Hossenfelder and her papers on Talk:Superdeterminism already. ACaseOfWednesdays (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia wants to avoid another Donna Strickland fiasco. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.23.190.23 (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Is there a big risk of that in this case? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:581B:F7D5:BA34:7B2D (talk) 13:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Picture
Is that really the worst picture of her you could find? WithGLEE (talk) 20:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)


 * It seems that she was the one who uploaded the photo to Wikimedia, so if you think it's unflattering then you should refer to her. :) Gbear605 (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Sabine Hossenfelder.jpg

“Public engagement and scientific achievements” - misnamed?
This section doesn’t mention any scientific achievements and there’s also a section named “Research”. It’s confusing to the reader (I went there first instead of Research) and it’s also just two unrelated topics jammed together. Should it be renamed “Public Engagement”? Or “Public engagement and science outreach”? Jaredjeya (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)