Talk:Sajeeb Wazed

Untitled
The information regarding net wealth of Mr. Wazed is nothing but a propaganda. All so called reference links of that information are from personal blog site and are totally fake. There is no authentic source of any public disclosure of Mr. Wazeds net wealth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushantaa (talk • contribs) 11:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Untitled
To Ragib, How am i violating anything by putting up a picture? I put up the picture twice last month and you removed it. You even went as far as blocking my IP address on wikipedia. What is this bullshit? I clearly have every right to put up a picture becoz the image box clearly says that I can put up a picture if i have one. And you have no right to block my IP address for that cz i clearly haven't violated any wikipedia policies by putting by the picture of Sajeeb Wazed. Please give me elaborate reasons why u blocked my IP address for such a long time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazaan (talk • contribs) 13:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

what kind of bio is this?

Why has this been nominated for speedy deletion? The subject has clear notability. If the article needs improvement (eg adding reliable sources), improve it. Recurring dreams 02:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please state exactly where the assertion of notability is in this article. --Deskana (talk) 02:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * A Google search turned up 10,400 hits, which is decent. Many of which were blogs, but I did find this: http://e-bangladesh.org/topnews/exclusive-interview-sajeeb-wazed-joy.html.  Don't know if it's real notability or just 15 minutes of fame.  Useight 02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please state exactly where the assertion of notability is in this article. --Deskana (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Exactly, and the blogosphere, and complaining about his mother's arrest asserts no real reason for notability. His mother, if anyone, is the notable one here -- L augh! 02:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The son of a major political figure currently imprisoned, and hence acting as major spokesman. A major figure in the Awami League party. A major figure in Bangladeshi politics. A major figure vis a vis Hasina's trip to the US this year. Mentioned and discussed as a successor to the Awami League leadership. This in a country of over a 150 million people. Over 10000 ghits, ignoring the fact that the vast majority of sources will be in another language, and not on the web. Recurring dreams 02:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Information not stated in the article at all. At present, this article does not assert the notability of the subject. I suggest you add them before another administrator deletes it. --Deskana (talk) 02:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I will. Isn't using speedy deletion and afd to improve an article using a sledgehammer to break a walnut? A cleanup or add more sources tag would have sufficed. Recurring dreams 02:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it worked didn't it? Plus, it's not like L knew all this stuff you just said. It should either be in the article, or the article should not exist. --Deskana (talk) 02:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, but you're under the mistaken view that I care to improve the article. I don't really care if it stays or goes- if it asserts no notability (or doesn't even hint at it), and there's no reason to believe it's notable from reading through it and checking external links, then I will nominate it under A7. If it's notable, people take notice and it gets fixed quickly, if not, it gets removed quickly. Like Deskana said, if you can't put it in the article, the article should not exist, and if you can't source it in the article and prove that it is notable, then it will be taken to AfD to see if the assertions are correct -- L augh! 02:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I've done the best I can with referencing for the time being, I may add a few later when I have more time. But I'll say this: the day that deleting articles without doing any research about the subject becomes policy, is a very sad day for wikipedia. I thought this signpost story may have been exaggerating, but I am off to join the article rescue squadron. Recurring dreams 03:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It already is policy. -- L augh! 03:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read that policy: Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved or reduced to a stub; if so, speedy deletion is probably inappropriate. Recurring dreams 03:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read the entire policy, including the criteria, A7- does not assert the importance or significance of the subject.. I did consider it, and it could not be improved because it does not meet notability requirements. -- L augh! 03:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * And how did you decide that? A gut feeling that it was not notable? Looking for some reliable sources? Recurring dreams 03:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've been over this far more than enough times with you. You can read our speedy deletion policies if you like, I have better things to do with my time -- L augh! 16:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I have declined to delete it. The article asserts importance or notability, and thus cannot be deleted as speedy. It is enough to make some good-faith claim to notability to prevent speedy--it does not have to meet the requirements for actional retention in WP. If the notability is uncertain or disputed, then the place to dispute it is AfD. DGG (talk) 18:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

New material
OK, I've done my fourth revert, but I think this is clearly libelous material and should be removed. I have posted my concerns at the WP:BLP noticeboard, and raised the user's conduct at WP:AIV. The source given is essentially an attack piece from a magazine, and the user is clearly using language that violates WP:NPOV. Until these concerns are addressed I don't think the material should be included. Recurring dreams 07:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

How is it libelous if the facts are in public record? The magazine in question is Probe News Magazine which is a widely published and reputated magazine. They publish their magazine articles online as well from which you can clearly see that the magazine is not some online tabloid Recurring dreams made it out to be. Also their is nothing libelous or dubious about a plain and simple arrest that was made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapedkrusader (talk • contribs) 14:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

OK, here's the article in question:.
 * It is a hatchet piece from a source that does comply with Reliable sources. Just an example from the lead: He seems quite happy with his cushy life in the United States, notwithstanding his several scrapes with the law and other shady tales.
 * How is this not reliable? How else would you term a 'cushy life'? Probe Magazine is not an online tabloid. It is actually a well published and distributed magazine in Bangladesh. Look at their other articles and see if there are traces of tabloid material and then you are welcome to accuse the publication. Kapedkrusader 13:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * If you believe this information is in the "public record" as you put it, see if you can try finding another reliable source?
 * Do you want me to contact the Texax police on this? How would I "prove" the conversation I would have with them? Kapedkrusader 13:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Your own edits to the page violate WP:NPOV. You start your included material with "Like his mother, Sajeeb Wazed is no stranger to arrest."
 * Sheikh Hasina has been arrested numerous times now. Sajeeb Wazed has also been arrested a few times. This makes both of them no stranger to arrest. I don't see how much neutral you can get. Kapedkrusader 13:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * You clearly have an agenda with regards to this issue, as you have been also adding a link to this "Probe Magazine" article to Sheikh Hasina; the link does not comply with WP:EL with regard to this article, as it has nothing to do with the subject of the article.
 * You also have an agenda trying to hide widely known facts. I am simply giving everyone an npov while you are trying to present a one sided view. Kapedkrusader 13:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Please discuss your inclusion before making IP reverts. Sign in and discuss your concerns. Thank you.
 * I have not done any IP reverts. So stop accusing me of your misdemeanors. Kapedkrusader 13:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Recurring dreams 13:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * You want to show that the Probe Magazine is a tabloid but with all their articles online you are unable to show that the reference is indeed tabloid material. There's nothing libelous about a plain and simple arrest. Kapedkrusader 22:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Read the article itself. Also, is there any mention of this in any other source in the press? Anywhere? If the publication was so reliable, and clearly this is a notable event, would there not be some mention? You also have some misunderstanding about the nature of sourcing; because you know of something first hand, doesn't mean you can use that as a verifiable source. See WP:OR. Recurring dreams 05:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * As for IP edits, several IP addresses have been making identical changes to you, using the same sources. You really can't expect us to believe that was someone else? Recurring dreams 02:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Its not me knowing something. It WAS PUBLISHED, YES PUBLISHED in a widely distributed PRINTED MAGAZINE. Understand that first and then talk about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapedkrusader (talk • contribs) 19:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

What is the matter with this Ragib? How am i violating anything by putting up a picture. I put up the picture twice last month and you removed. You even went as far as blocking my IP address on wikipedia. What is this bullshit? I clearly have every right to put up a picture. And you have no right to block my IP address for that cz i clearly haven't violated any wikipedia policies by putting by the picture of Sajeeb Wazed. Please give me elaborate reasons why u blocked my IP address for such a long time?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazaan (talk • contribs) 13:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Ragib's biased monitoring
Mr Ragib is acting like an agent of Mr. Wazed Jr. Virtually everything in the version he has semi-protected against all corrections is without any valid source. Irrelevant topics such as the Awami win in the election has been highlighted. Broken links have been given to an unknown organization called Suchinta, and two unknown persons in charge of it. In fact, the promotion of this insignificant organization seems to be the main motivation behind this article. Negative aspects of Wazed Jr.'s activities widely available on the web, including multiple published sources, are being suppressed by design. This article weakens wikipedia's role as a reliable source of important information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.112.196.90 (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * You are most welcome to call me an agent, and what not :). The article has been semi protected to prevent the recent wave of vandalism in it. Please get an account and then return with your list of suggested changes. I agree that the article has unreferenced content, and per WP:BLP, these should be removed. By the way, "probe news" is not a valid news source, so don't keep waving it as "proof" of Mr. Wazed's arrest record. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 16:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Pending changes
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Pending changes/Queue  are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.

The following request appears on that page:

Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Penfding changes" would be appreciated.

Please update the Queue page as appropriate.

Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 23:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC).

Baal-Chera.

Talkmarani.27.131.12.12 (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism
Someone should really take care of this page. His net worth figure has to be a joke. Also, why exactly is there a neutrality tag? Except for a bit of sentimental rubbish on his nickname, I can't see a reason for a tag on the top of the article.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2014
This Net worth 	US$ 1 billion[1][2][3] should be deleted. The references are not from such source which could be accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushantaa (talk • contribs) 09:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Net Worth: US 1 billion https://www.pinterest.com/pin/294422894361418111/ - 166.48.92.200 (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Not Done Pinterest is not a Reliable source. - 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit Request
This Net worth US$ 1 billion[1][2][3] should be replaced with actual or removed. The sources mentioned are not acceptable sources. 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Digital Thief
Sajeeb Wazed imposed so called digital number plates (made of cheap tin without anything electronic/digital) for cars in Bangladesh with help of his mother Sheikh Hasina to earn illegal commission from a US company who are collecting charges from vehicle owners in Bangladesh even after four years of installation. Bangladesh government charged 50 USD for those cheap number plates and suddenly after four years they are collecting 15 USD more illegally mentioning that the price of number plates is increased after four years and they are collecting the balance money this year. After this scandal of number plates, Sajeeb Wazed is titled as "Digital Thief" in Bangladesh which should be mentioned at his bio I think. 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdboy99 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Digital Thief
Sajeeb Wazed imposed so called digital number plates (made of cheap tin without anything electronic/digital) for cars in Bangladesh with help of his mother Sheikh Hasina to earn illegal commission from a US company who are collecting charges from vehicle owners in Bangladesh even after four years of installation. Bangladesh government charged 50 USD for those cheap number plates and suddenly after four years they are collecting 15 USD more illegally mentioning that the price of number plates is increased after four years and they are collecting the balance money this year. After this scandal of number plates, Sajeeb Wazed is titled as "Digital Thief" in Bangladesh which should be mentioned at his bio I think. 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdboy99 (talk • contribs) 08:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2016
2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC) If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ". Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 12:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: as you have not requested a change.

j[yhlx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.63.159.6 (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Better sourcing needed
I added a "dubious" tag to the following sentence:

In 2010, the pro-Bangladesh Nationalist Party newspaper, Amar Desh leaked documents claiming Wazed took $2 million from Chevron in exchange for allowing the multinational energy corporation to install a gas compressor.

Although there are two footnotes, one goes to a non-English source. While there is no requirement that sources be in English, I don't see that the source has any content. Given my nonexistent Bengali abilities, I hope someone else will corroborate or correct me if I'm wrong. The second footnote goes to an empty page.

A strong claim such as this deserves strong sourcing, which should either be supplied or the claim should be removed.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Wishing to add from this source
Hi, I found a source from which i could add some info to this page. I need some help in verifying this "source". http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1060321 From what i read there, some of the info looks kinda legit. There are also some infos mentioned there about the biography of Sajib Wazed Joy that isn't mentioned in the wikipedia page. I'd appreciate any help given to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkSpartan (talk • contribs) 14:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 November 2020
In infobox_person, relatives and relations are aliases for each other. The Sajeeb Wazed article uses both and so they conflict with each other. relations is the second one listed so that is displayed, overriding the value in relatives.

In the infobox, please change See Sheikh–Wazed family to See Sheikh–Wazed family. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 01:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 November 2020
infobox_person#Inline_lists says: "Do not use markup to create fake lists, as in:  ."

In infobox_person for Sajeeb Wazed, please change:



to:

and change:



to:



and change:



to:



– 108.56.139.120 (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Done davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  21:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Obama Hasina UNGA.jpg

Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
The whole leadership section reads like a promotion without any sourcing. A cursory google search reveals that this is an individual with numerous corruption charges pending. 45.120.115.229 (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  (talk | contribs) 11:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2024
The Leadership section is glaring and lacking proper citations.

Suggestion to make a minor improvement by removing the Non-Neutral Wording / Peacock Language; specifically removing the following sentence from the section: ''Using his mother's position and his own personal reputation among party leaders, he could easily have opted for a top position in the party. However, his humility, willing to learn from the bottom and leadership traits did not allow him to do that.''

Further, it is entirely unsubstantiated and irrelevant to the article, which should be factual and not an advertisement. ZeroSaiin (talk) 12:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ Lightoil (talk) 17:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)