Talk:Salem witch trials/GA1

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 21, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Yes
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Historically accurate
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: A bit of working might be needed here, but with exception of a phrase here or there, it is NPOV.
 * 5. Article stability? Stable enough, although it has been vandalized several times.
 * 6. Images?: Well illustrated for this kind of topics. It should however be improved to include more pictures and images, books such as "The Crucible" could be of some help.

A nice piece of work. A bit of working and we have ourselves a Featured Article. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— &Lambda;ua&int;  Wi  se  (talk) 11:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)