Talk:Sandro Chia

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sandro Chia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202045131/http://www.sandrochia.com/ to http://www.sandrochia.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.oxfordartonline.com/groveart/view/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7000016388 and https://web.archive.org/web/20131011234229/http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2013/10/new-york-best-murals_slideshow_Palio-Bar_2. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Artsy
Artsy is not a reliable source by our standards – it's a promotional platform for art galleries to "Build relationships with new and seasoned collectors around the world", "Promote [their&#93; works and artists to the largest online art audience" and "Facilitate sales in one place with ease". As such it also does not fulfil our requirements for an acceptable external link, as it is not a "Site[ s ] that contain[s] neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article". I've removed it from the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * And has stuck it back. Why do you think this worth edit-warring over, Coldcreation? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The link was added to External links. It has nothing to do with WP:RS as you claimed when you removed it from the article. It is not a source. The link does however have to do with WP:ELYES, and is in effect perfectly acceptable. That said, there are other websites that show his artwork that would be just as acceptable, such as Artcyclopedia (which now replaces Artsy in the article). Coldcreation (talk) 14:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)