Talk:Sara Pezzini

why is the character listed in LGBT characters? the relationships in the article are all with guys, and she is a born female

Fair use rationale for Image:Witchblade.jpg
Image:Witchblade.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Comics vs. Series
It has only been suggested that Ian and Sara could be genetically related. Irons said that Elizabeth Bronte's stem cells were used in his creation and revealed nothing about Ian's parentage. Ian seems aware of that connection, but he repeatedly refers to Sara's bloodline as "your bloodline."

Julie did not appear in the TV series. The woman Ian kissed was Aras, a woman genetically identical to Sara. According to Eric Etebari, at the end of the second season Ian was a virgin and would continue to pursue Sara. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.66.178 (talk) 21:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Inclusion in a listicle
Someone is determined to include, in the lede, the fact that this character was included in a random listicle. This goes right against what Wikipedia is not. There is no end of such listicles, which cost nothing to create and are of no objective merit and based on entirely subjective criteria. It does not belong in the lede, and I would argue does not belong at all. Guy (Help!) 14:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I assume "listicle" is a portmanteau of list and article, used to disparage the publication. But that would be incorrect, the work in question is not an article but a book published by Comics Buyers Guide and Krause Publications. I assure it did cost Krause something to create and being subjective is no reason to exclude the content, or we would have to remove all forms of reception from Wikipedia. I have no preference of where it should be placed but it should be placed somewhere.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)