Talk:Sarsen

[Untitled]
·--216.109.0.5 (talk) 13:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)A very light-weight page. Strange to use a picture of a megalithic monument in an article concerning the lithotype itself. I'll have to see what I got last week at Avebury ... nothing close-up of the stones themselves, unfortunately. Something I'll have to remember next time I'm down there.

Searching Jnl.Geol.Soc.Lond, I come up with the following sarsen-related papers :

E. C. Spicer "Sarsen-Stones in a Claypit" Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society v61: pp39-42.

George Maw "On the Occurrence of Consolidated Blocks in the Drift of Suffolk" Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society v23: pp110-114. I'll see what I can do to update the article. Aidan Karley (talk) 09:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC) the sarsen stones are 6 centimeters squared and 21ft tall→

To add to article
To add to this article: an explanation of why "Saracen stone" was used to refer to stone indigenous to the British Isles. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)