Talk:Saturn C-4

Confusing
The article says: Later: and later:
 * "It met the initial requirements for a lunar orbit rendezvous and lunar landing mission."
 * "but it would not have been able to carry the 15,000 kg (32,000 lb) Lunar Module as well"
 * "it decided to use the larger Saturn V which would provide a reserve payload capacity."

If it met the initial conditions, then what happened - did the expected mass of the LM get larger? Then the second sentence says that it couldn't carry the actual LM. And the third sentence says that the Saturn V was used for reserve payload capacity. It sounds like the Saturn V was required instead. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 07:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Contradiction
The sidebar (which describes something very similar to the Saturn C-3 sidebar) is contradicted by the text "The first and second stages were essentially four-engine variants of the stages that would be used on the Saturn V" as well as the description in Saturn V. 128.230.72.98 (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The sidebar links to S-IB for the first stage, but that is wrong. It is more like a four-engine version of the S-IC. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saturn C-4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120617183721/http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnc4.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnc4.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111011054546/http://astronautix.com/lvs/saturnc4.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnc4.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)