Talk:Scarborough F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

Virtually all football club pages on WP have "F.C." abbreviated in the title (see Category:English football clubs) apart from this one, please move for standardisation's sake. Qwghlm 23:24, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS It can't be done the normal way, as the redirect at Scarborough F.C. used to be a stub, before being merged into this page.


Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support as above. Qwghlm 23:24, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Sebastian Kessel Talk 23:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for the sake of consistency, although I'd prefer Football Club written out in full if it applied to all articles. CTOAGN 00:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Pal 02:23, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- Elisson Talk 07:47, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --Stalfur 20:25, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for the sake of consistency. — Dale Arnett 21:18, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Dragons flight 00:30, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

Just wanted to request confirmation that the above is no longer at Scarborough. Soccerbase states otherwise. Please post any replies on my talk page. Thanks. - Dudesleeper · Talk 20:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dissolution[edit]

Just wanted to inform you that there are no players at all any more as the club is no longer.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.129.112.205 (talkcontribs)

Squad/Staff[edit]

I am very doubtful about the merit in keeping these two sections. It is not normal to keep squad lists from earlier seasons and the staff section is more detailed than usual. BlueValour 20:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Removal of Squad & Staff Lists[edit]

As someone else said "I am very doubtful about the merit in keeping these two sections. It is not normal to keep squad lists from earlier seasons and the staff section is more detailed than usual". If agreed I believe they should be removed.Randomjack 08:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support If you look at other clubs that are now defunct, they do noto have Squad/Staff lists Randomjack 08:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]
  • Support BlueValour 01:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

  • Decision carried then, as it seems not too many people are bothered! I will remove them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomjack (talkcontribs)

North Yorkshire[edit]

Like it or not, North Yorkshire is the correct administrative area, not the North Riding, and since this is an encyclopaedia we have to be factually correct. BlueValour 14:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I see no need for this separate page. The content fits just fine in the main article. BlueValour (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's is need of expansion, which I should be able to carry out soon with this. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nav box[edit]

Hi there,

The Scarborough F.C. Navigation box links to North Marine Road. The box is rightly appended on the North Marine Road article, but the article itself makes no mention of any football matches being played there. Does anyone fancy adding a little bit? I was looking into the cricket ground etc, and saw the football nav-box and got a bit confused. In fact I even wondered if the link was pointing to the right article. Scarborough F.C. states that the football club played some matches at the cricket ground, so that is fine, but I feel it should be clear in both articles.

Regards, –MDCollins (talk) 10:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Scarborough F.C./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

References need sorting out to use {{cite}} templates.

Some copy editing in the history details required. Probably then ready for GA review.

Keith D 13:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 13:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)