Talk:Scherrie Payne

Neutral Point of View
This article violates the policy of keeping a neutral point of view in articles. It reads as if it were written by an overly enthusiastic fan, including such subjective language as "excellent single." Can someone please clean this up and remove all hyperbole and subjectivity from the article? I do not feel I know enough about the subject matter to be an effective editor.2605:6000:E8C3:EE00:C0D9:623F:47F:C8BF (talk) 11:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Only a die-hard fan would even remember Payne, let alone, tout her accomplishments? It is all about internet access and Wikipedia's policy about letting virtually anyone contribute to it. Such a policy is the strength and the weakness of Wikipedia. It is all about trivia.  Supremes fans are the worst culprits of such trivia. Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 18:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The actual difference is that Wikipedia has an strict policy on this NPOV policy and it was being used in the Former Ladies of the Supremes article, and I removed some of the material from the article that sounded like a fan club made the article. An IP user put an concert event on Lynda Laurence, and the same as the FLOS article, and it did not even compare to any encyclopedic standards in which would sentences would look like in a encyclopedia. It is using discogs as a "reliable source" but is not a good source for information about singles or whatever.Oldschoollover24 (talk) 02:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)