Talk:Schramm–Loewner evolution

Priority
I find it strange that the most impressive success of probability theory in 21 century, awarded by Fields medal, is assessed low priority. As for me, it speaks about Wikipedia, not about SLE. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 17:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, now it is of mid priority. About Fields medals: another one is given to Stanislav Smirnov! It is rumored to be unprecedented: two Fields medals in succession, for a single theory. (The first one was to Wendelin Werner.) Boris Tsirelson (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Priority is more about the number of readers who wish to gain a detailed understanding of a topic. When a topic gets a chapter in dozens of textbooks, its going to be high-priority. By contrast, celebrated results will typically be marked low-priority, as they are of interest primarily to specialists with detailed knowledge of the field. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Introduction
Seeking consensus on the reorganization of the introduction. Any other ideas besides previous edit? (User:AHusain314) 6:46 18 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Schramm–Loewner evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090918041127/http://www.math.duke.edu:80/~jose/esi.html to http://www.math.duke.edu/~jose/esi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)