Talk:Scorigami

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 December 2020 by reviewer JalenFolf (talk · contribs).

American football

	American football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sports

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

Chart[edit]

It would be great to get a scorigami chart into this article. LukeSurl^t c 14:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i second that!

also, why "origami" in the first place?

i like these kind of portmanteaus, but they need to be relevant words! what does origami have to do with ANYTHING here?! 2601:19C:527F:A660:B9FC:7AA9:5EA2:188 (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. The relevance needs to be explained. So far, it's just non-sensical, made-up word. Was it just "score" and "game" with stuff added so it sounded like something people would recognise as an existing word? Is it just a case of a clueless person doing stupid things? (The chart seems like a good idea, though. Relevant, even.) 84.250.167.255 (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a portmanteau of "score" and "origami". As Bois says in the very first line of the article on the Secret Base website and within ther first seconds of the video that launched the concept, its a word he made up. The name has stuck. It doesn't really make much sense, any origami connnection is tenuous to the point of non-existance. I can't see any sensible way of explaining it in the article because there's no real explanation. --LukeSurl^t c 20:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

done -1ctinus📝🗨 12:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I am working on one BigRed606 (talk) 07:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Year of creation[edit]

The article claims Jon Bois invented the term scorigami in 2016, but he has an article from 2014 about it (notably spelling it scoragami, with two a's). I did a few quick edits to the page, but I may have messed something up, and this might warrant some more major edits. NerdTheBox (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LukeSurl: how is tracking the latest scorigami considered "unencyclopedic" ?[edit]

In your latest revision of the article you deleted the tracker that obtains the recent scorigami. Is giving an example of the most recent example of something unencylopedic? Fair catch kick mentions the most recent example in the article, and is a good article. I am in favor of keeping the tracker. I am very new to Wikipedia so I would loved to see which rule it breaks in your opinion. -1ctinus📝🗨 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say "unencylopedic" in the edit summary so I'm not sure what you are quoting.

My issue with this is that including the most recent example creates a requirement to continually update the aricle, otherwise such a statement will become false. Its also hard to verify, as a citation can verify that a particular scorigami occured, but it cannot verify that no others have occured since. The reader is trusting that this article is checked and updated each week.

Overall though, I don't feel too strongly about this - it did seem to be kept up-to-date this season. If you want to add it back in I won't remove unless it seems to fall out-of-date. LukeSurl^t c 13:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just say something like "As of [date last updated] the most recent scorigami is [insert scorigami]"? NerdTheBox (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, strictly speaking this is original research if it's not published in a reliable source. Remsense诉 20:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there are reliable sources that report on this when it happens, somehow. i’ll re-add it but not with the twitter bot. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]