Talk:Seachd: The Inaccessible Pinnacle

Fair use rationale for Image:Seachd poster2.jpg
Image:Seachd poster2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Seven
"Seachd" is the Gaelic word for "seven". Can anyone explain why it is used as the title of this film? Are there seven stories told by the old man? Or is the word meant in another sense altogether? --Doric Loon (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The original concept came from the film Foighidinn (patience). Somebody's granny was supposed to have said "well, you've done one of the virtues, why not do the other 6?"  So there was going to be 7 stories, each a parable about a different virtue, but in the end the I don't know if the stories and still linked to virtues, and now the grandfather only tells 6 stories, with the 7th being the story of the boy and his grandfather.  I don't have a source to hand though, so I'm not adding it into the article.Prof Wrong (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Nach eil sin inntinneach? Thanks. --Doric Loon (talk) 18:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)