Talk:Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vesper flying chrysanthemum (talk · contribs) 11:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

This article is well-written and meets the relevent criteria.

1. Well-written: Sentences are encyclopedic and there are no grammatical errors. The manual of style for this article is valid. 2. Verifiable with no original research: Article is extensively referenced with 224 in total, pertinent for the length, unreliable sources (e.g., Twitter/Facebook) are minimal and each of those utilised (e.g., 54th) are directly referred to in the article. 3. Broad in coverage: The article is long, comprehensive, and with information on background, opinions and impeachment details. Sections are also not overtly long and link to relevant other Wikipedia articles on the topics. AN example would be the two background sections, each linked to the main article. 4. Neutral: Article maintains a relevant encyclopedic tone and rarely shows any Democratic or Republican bias. An example would be the follwoing sentence: "Four scenarios for the removal of Trump from office had been posited by members of Congress, members of Trump's cabinet, political commentators, or legal scholars: resignation, the invocation of the 14th Amendment, invocation of the 25th Amendment, or impeachment and conviction."Stable: 5. Stability: Generally good, there might be rare acts of vandalism, but the last one, which removed 11,000 bites and said that it took out the lies, was from 5 May 2021, The other previous ones were from March and February respectively, but day-to-day stability is well ensured and vandalism on rare occasions is promptly addressed, and no problems have emerged recently. 6. Illustrated: Extensive and with detailed annotations and relevant links.

Overall, this article is passed for a good article criteria. Congratulations from Vesper flying chrysanthemum.
 * Vesper flying chrysanthemum Thank you for the review and the feedback! You also need to pass the article using the WP:GAN/I policy. Phillip Samuel (talk) 16:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)