Talk:Senakhtenre Ahmose

New find
His nomen will probably be forthcoming, as they've just found a doorjamb and fragmentary limestone lintelwith Senakht-en-Re's name, and apart from his prenomen, you can clearly see that his nomen is there, only covered by some soft material from the lifting of the stone. Source: Original article — Preceding unsigned comment added by PLstrom (talk • contribs) 00:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, news just came out that his name is Senakhtenre Ahmose. So it seems we may need to change the title of the article. Apparently he was not named Tao at all. --AB (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should be renamed: Ahmose I.-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.170.193 (talk) 03:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Senakhtenre Ahmose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311054112/http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/uk/index.php?page=senakhtenre to http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/uk/index.php?page=senakhtenre

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Lemma: Ahmose I
The article should be moved to Ahmose I, because it is the first king with this sa-Ra-name. Ahmose I should be moved to Ahmose II and Ahmose II to Ahmose III.--183.182.121.20 (talk) 10:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not up to you to decide the ordinal numbers. Only Egyptologists can. And in all probability, they won't do it. Khruner (talk) 12:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)