Talk:Senatus consultum Macedonianum

Merging into Roman litigation
I doubt this would be a good idea. A polished article on Roman litigation would be pretty long, and if the senatusconsultum Macedonianum were to be included, it would probably be good for the sake of consistancy to include the other Senate decisions too. That would probably make the article too long. There are also the various legis actiones, etc. Finally, I bet there is enough interesting information out there on the senatusconsultum Macedonianum to allow the article to stand on its own. modify 18:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Title
Why was the article moved from its proper title of "Senatus consultum Macedonianum" to the current erroneous version of "Senatusconsultum Macedonianum"? There ought to be a space between "Senatus" and "consultum". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.51.93 (talk) 07:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Nb from talk history: 19:22, 12 March 2012‎ Chesterx... moved page Talk:Senatusconsultum Macedonianum to Talk:Senatus consultum Macedonianum: proper name is senatus consultum, vide A.Dębiński, Roman Private Law. Compedium., Lexis Nexis, Warsaw 2008 Ifly6 (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

in potestate
We need to define in potestate. RJFJR (talk) 02:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)