Talk:Sentencia Arbitral de Guadalupe

Maintenance tags
Can you explain your thoughts and justification regarding the recently added tags copy edit and sections? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I see three issues. One is it can be broken down into section. Which makes reading article easy. Second, It only has one reference. Multiple reference are always good. Third, once it is broken down into section, copy editing can be done. I hope it clarify. Tags are there to improve article.--Spasage (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't ask about the one source tag, because I agree with you that a lot more references are needed. As far as the two tags I did ask about, your response doesn't completely clarify; could you elaborate?
 * Regarding sections: the article is essentially a stub, consisting of six short paragraphs. Although this is longer than the maximum of four paragraphs recommended at WP:LEAD, one of the paragraphs consists of only one sentence, and two others of only two. Plenty of articles have leads longer than this entire article.  Nevertheless, if you believe that sections would help readability, I'm not opposed; could you suggest what sections you were thinking of?
 * The copy edit tag calls for improvements in grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. Honestly, I see little room for improvement there, as the article is currently constituted.  If you can you point me to any specific errors of grammar, style or spelling that you found, I'll be happy to fix them.  Ditto if you perceive problems in cohesion or tone.  If you can't, then I don't know what that tag is doing there. Mathglot (talk) 18:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are satisfy with copy editing, you can remove that tag, but for other two, they should stay. This article should be divided into sections.--Spasage (talk) 18:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)