Talk:Server Side Public License

This license infringes on FSF copyrights, see: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html

Another important issue is that AGPL allows combination with GPL software, while this license explicitly asks to be under this same license. It should be mentioned as important difference in the article.

Rcdrun (talk) 06:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand why OSI says it's a "fauxpen". Is this because the user of the software under the licence is obliged to not hide anything? Because under AGPL, we can hide the modification of the original code? Pingo-power (talk) 18:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Pingo-Power (talk) 07:00, 7 July 2022 (CET)


 * The article covers this question (see e.g. "In contrast, the AGPL v3's section 13 covers only the program itself ..."). Which parts of the explanations there are unclear? Regards, HaeB (talk) 06:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)