Talk:Shear and moment diagram

Images
Unfortunately there are no pictures in this article anymore.


 * There is an image in the examples section. Wizard191 (talk) 21:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

With regards that image, i think it might be incorrect : should the figure to the right of the bending moment diagram be -3.2 rather than -3.3? 131.111.185.34 (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Relationships between load, shear, and moment diagrams
The variables are not defined in the equations in this section. Makes it hard to understand the equations. Thanks David Hollman (Talk) 10:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Concrete design convention
The "Concrete design convention" section, as written, is confusing and does not contribute to the article. Unfortunately I don't know myself whether there is a significant difference in convention, so I'm leaving it up for now. 169.229.85.45 (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Changed it to conform to general consensus on engineering forum of how the convention is used. XFEM Skier (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Units
Would it be an idea to use SI-units? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.89.179.22 (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Definitely not! The purpose of using US customary units ("Davy Crockett Units") is to exclude 99% of the article's prospective readership. We don't want everybody understanding this topic, do we? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.23.204 (talk) 10:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Title
The title shear force and bending moment diagram is the apt one rather than "shear and moment diagram".isn't it friends?Aadhipkesavan (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Absolutely terrible way to draw shear and moment diagrams
Writing out the equations is an absolutely terrible way to draw these and should never be used in practice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSuperCE (talk • contribs) 01:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)