Talk:Sheffield Central Library

Untitled
re: the merger. I would suggest not, particularly since Graves Art Gallery is actually the longer article! I think they should stay as separate articles.  L.J.Skinner wot 16:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * No response in over a month, so I shall remove the merge templates.  L.J.Skinner wot 23:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Nonsensical revert
This revert, with the edit summary "Rermove (sic) coord - use coor title d until coord has full functions" makes no sense - coord already has "full functions" - far more, in fact, than coor title d has. Andy Mabbett 12:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with Lewis's sensible revert. It is not agreed that coord has full functions - see ongoing discussion at MOS talk. -- roundhouse 15:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sigh As I've already told you, in more than one discussion, and above, coord has all the functions of coor title d, and many more besides. It's already being used on tens of thousands of articles. Andy Mabbett 15:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sigh indeed. Let consensus emerge, let a bot do it. -- roundhouse 15:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Coordinates
The coordinates have just been removed from the infobox, with the edit summary "fix". What was broken? Andy Mabbett 12:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Coord
For the record, on this talk page, I object to the replacement of coor title d with coord until the position re Google is demonstrably resolved.

I also object to duplication - the appearance of the coordinates both in the title and the infobox. -- roundhouse 12:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Andy, can you fix the infobox so that the coordinates row does not display (as discussed many times)? A library is not a landmark and does not need coords in the infobox. I have no problem otherwise with the precision or coord. -- roundhouse0 20:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't agree with either your unfounded assertion that the City's main library (nor, indeed, any library) is not a landmark, nor your personal aesthetic preference. The template is designed to include coordinates. Since nothing is broken, there is nothing to "fix". Andy Mabbett 10:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Whence this obsession with coordinates? Why do we need them twice in a brief article about a library? -- roundhouse0 11:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The other objection (apart from needless duplication) to coords in the infobox is that they appear at 90% in the title and clash with the hoz line (in Firefox, default skin, and Opera, ditto). -- roundhouse0 12:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sheffield Central Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208191507/http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/in-your-area/libraries/find/central to http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/in-your-area/libraries/find/central

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)