Talk:Shirley Boys' High School

Fair use rationale for Image:SBHS334424234234.gif
Image:SBHS334424234234.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Controversies section - undue weight
The first of the issues covered in this section at present covers an isolated incident of a violent attack on a student in the school grounds. Regrettably, such incidents are relatively common, but many will never reach the news. There is a significant risk that including this in the article gives a misleading impression of the school as a whole. The second of the issues concerns the findings of a survey of high school students about their experience of sexual harassment. The scope of the survey included the students experience "at school, online, or when socialising outside school grounds". So the scope of the survey goes far beyond just what happens at school. Again, I am concerned that including this in the article gives a misleading impression of the school as a whole.

I propose that the entire section should be deleted. Comments please, before I action this.Marshelec (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I support the removal with the reasons provided. — Panamitsu (talk) 05:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I support the removal of the section. yvanyblog (talk) 05:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)